StudioGlyphic

"Your opponent cannot fold if you do not bet or raise." –Abdul

Democratic Presidential Debate – NYC

Posted on | February 29, 2004 | No Comments

Watch the New York City Democratic Presidential Debate online.

Now that the field has been winnowed down to four candidates, the format is not as strictly regulated. The four candidates are sitting together at a large table opposite Dan Rather and two other moderators.

The fact that pressure is building on Edwards to differentiate himself from Kerry and make a good showing on Tuesday made this one of the most contentious debates of the season. Adding to the contention is the fact that the moderators, especially the woman (from the NY Times?), keep interrupting. Sharpton added fuel to the fire by stating implicitly and explicitly that the debate was being conducted unfairly.

The debate started off with a weird question about the candidates’ religious beliefs. Later came a question about whether God was on the side of the United States. Wtf?!

Edwards was pretty effective at grabbing time, and Kucinich was particularly ineffective. Sharpton tried to shout his way into getting more time, which really rubbed me the wrong way.

Edwards did too much recycling of his stump speech.

The bitch moderator tried to bait Kerry by asking, “Are you a liberal?” I’m surprised she didn’t ask, “Are you now or have you ever been a liberal?” Kerry dodged the question, called labels silly, brought up examples from his record to show he wasn’t liberal. Kucinich proudly proclaimed himself as a liberal. Asked whether Kerry was a liberal, Kucinich said “no.” Sharpton said Bush’s extremism made everyone look liberal, but that Kerry wasn’t really a liberal. Edwards chimed in (more effectively than Kerry) that labels from insider publications were meaningless and that issues were most important to people. Kerry then effectively questioned Bush’s conservative bona fides and called the administration for being radical.

Another moderator questioned Edwards’ credibility on the poverty debate because he’s wealthy, listing his assets in DC and NC. Kucinich defended him against this line of questioning. Sharpton keeps trying to make some silly point about there not being just two Americas, but many. Edwards did a good job of wrapping it up by talking about the two Americas in education, health care, government, etc.

I don’t know. I’m going to vote for Edwards because I think it will be good for the country to have an extended Democratic race. If it were closer between Edwards and Kerry, I would vote for Dean and send delegates to the convention.

Update 2004-03-02 12:04

I’m voting for Dean.

Category: Politics

In-fighting at the Dean campaign

Posted on | February 29, 2004 | No Comments

washingtonpost.com: Divide and Bicker

The feuding and backbiting that plagued the Howard Dean campaign had turned utterly poisonous. Behind the facade of a successful political operation, senior officials plotted against each other, complained about the candidate and developed one searing doubt.

Dean, they concluded, did not really want to be president.

Interesting.

Update 2004-02-39 23:08

Howard’s response

Category: Politics

NPR : Talk Radio’s New, Liberal Hope

Posted on | February 28, 2004 | No Comments

NPR : Talk Radio’s New, Liberal Hope

Hmm.

Category: News

Grey Album

Posted on | February 28, 2004 | No Comments

Place one part Jay-Z’s Black Album and one part the Beatles’ White Album in large computer. Mix vigorously. Burn a 44 minute CD. Call it the Grey Album.

Not available in stores!

Category: Linkworthy

What’s Right With Kerry

Posted on | February 28, 2004 | No Comments

What’s Right With Kerry

We should be fair. We should also keep in my mind why John Kerry would be a vast improvement over the current occupant.

Category: Politics
keep looking »

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Archives